John Watson
gwalia at emerge.net.auFri Jan 18 13:15:25 EST 2008
Hi Sue Insuring a collection is a difficult thing. Valuation of an object is such a subjective process. Like you said, how do you value something unique, and if it is unique, where will you get another one if your original is lost? It's been my experience that in the main, valuation of items is more expensive than the replacement, if they are available. A loss can be catastrophic to a Museum or collection body, with only a small $ value like significant papers and photos, but then if you are following your disaster protocols, the originals will be in safe keeping and only copies will be lost (he says hopefully). I made similar enquiries to yours here in WA over the last couple of years, and it would seem the 'professional' opinion is not to insure collection items due to excessive cost, both of insurance and valuations, and because assessing the value of something is too difficult given an items national, international or local significance. Insurance companies apparently have difficulty with significance. Partial loss or damage insurance to a 'value' makes sense to us, but insurance companies want you to totally insure the value (with appropriate premiums of course!). If you don't insure more than about 85% of the value they class you as joint insurer and you are liable for whatever percentage of the repairs etc that they deem you have joint insured at. Mine field.and I think I just mined another paddock for you. Best bet to talk to one of the larger Insurance firms like Allianze, AON or Westminster perhaps. Many smaller organisations are under the wing of another one, like a Shire or City Council. thanks John John Watson (GDBMT, GDIT, CNA) Manager-Gwalia Historic Site Leonora Gwalia Historical Museum Ltd PO Box 111 or Tower St Leonora 6438 Gwalia WA Ph/Fax: (08) 9037 7122 Mob: 04199 58199 email: gwalia at emerge.net.au www.gwalia.org.au From: can-talk-bounces at collectionsaustralia.net [mailto:can-talk-bounces at collectionsaustralia.net] On Behalf Of FERREIRA Su Sent: 17 January 2008 11:46 To: k at preservationaustralia.com.au; Merle Hathaway; CAN Talk Subject: [can-talk] Insuring Historical colelcitons Good morning all, (those of you on the western sea board I guess!!) I have a question... it is concerned with the complex issue of insuring historical collections and if so to what level? Insurance being part of the overall framework of disaster planning and preparedness I would gratefully receive anyone's comments or opinions on insurance. Is it worth insuring something you cannot replace if stolen or destroyed? Does anyone use the a level of insurance that provides cover for repair and restoration only? If the objects survives a disaster, that costs are covered to clean up and restore. How do you value an object in financial terms which holds only local heritage value and provenance.... like horses hooves taken from a fire brigade horse as a memento post mortem? Any comments???? Cheers Susan Ferreira Curator/Project Manager FESA Community Hazard Awareness Centre & Museum Community Development Fire & Emergency Services Authority of WA Phone: 9323 9460 Fax: 9323 9495 Mbl: 0409 719 032 email: su.ferreira at fesa.wa.gov.au www.fesa.wa.gov.au Street - 25 Murray Street Perth WA Postal - PO Box P1174 WA 6844 FESA Museum Redevelopment Project - Supporting WA State Sustainability Strategy: conserving cultural heritage and helping to build sustainable and resilient communities. -----Original Message----- From: can-talk-bounces at collectionsaustralia.net [mailto:can-talk-bounces at collectionsaustralia.net] On Behalf Of Kay Soderlund Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2008 8:06 AM To: 'Merle Hathaway'; 'CAN Talk' Subject: Re: [can-talk] Censorship I fully agree with your sentiments Merle. It seems to me that the change in format from one discussion list on AMOL to the several different lists on CAN has resulted in a marked lessening of any type of discussion. A once vibrant and informative list on AMOL has turned into a notice board of events and job postings. I can't remember the last interesting discussion that came up on CAN-talk. Perhaps it is time to re-consider the format and go back to just one list to deal with all communication needs? Kay Soderlund Preservation Australia _____ From: can-talk-bounces at collectionsaustralia.net [mailto:can-talk-bounces at collectionsaustralia.net] On Behalf Of Merle Hathaway Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2008 12:12 PM To: CAN Talk Subject: [can-talk] Censorship As it is early in the year, and I'm not yet too busy to deal with this little irritation, I'll air it now. So could this please go through for comment by those CAN talk is supposed to serve - us, the subscribers. Since Can Talk replaced the AMOL listing I've tried several times to make comments, only to be told by the "gatekeeper" that my comments were not appropriate or should be elsewhere. I've always considered this a forum, especially useful for people like me who are isolated from their colleagues and remote from the large centres. Over the years I have really enjoyed the camaraderie we had. But our little chats and comments have now gone. There's little "talk". I know we are all busy, and no-one appreciates being bombarded by trivia, but really, if the only comments allowed relate to obscure pieces of farm machinery, knitted doilies etc, then it becomes too dry and discouraging of discussion. What do you think? regards m Merle Hathaway Director Horsham Regional Art Gallery 80 Wilson Street, Horsham, Victoria 3400, Australia (03) 5362 2880 t (03) 5382 5407 f Work mobile: 0447 595455 www.horshamartgallery.com.au -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.collectionsaustralia.net/pipermail/can-talk/attachments/20080118/ba4dfce5/attachment-0001.html |